A strong passing game and an early defensive touchdown helped the Los Angeles Rams beat the Tampa Bay Buccaneers 34–7 on November 23, 2025. However, the final score does not explain every part of the game. Tampa Bay gained more rushing yards and held the ball longer. The Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs Los Angeles Rams Match Player Stats show why those advantages were not enough. This breakdown covers the quarterbacks, runners, receivers, defensive leaders, special teams, and key team numbers from that meeting.
Which Game Does This Box Score Cover?
This article covers the game played at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, California, on Sunday, November 23, 2025. Los Angeles was the home team. Keeping the date clear matters because these teams have met in different seasons, with different players and results. Numbers from another meeting should not be mixed into this box score.
The Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs Los Angeles Rams Match Player Stats below describe one completed game. They are not season totals or predictions for a future matchup. For example, Matthew Stafford’s passing yards here belong to this performance alone. The same rule applies to rushing attempts, catches, tackles, and touchdowns throughout the article.
Final Score and Points by Quarter
Los Angeles scored 14 points in the first quarter and 17 in the second. Tampa Bay scored its only seven points during the second quarter. That gave the Rams a 31–7 halftime lead. Neither side scored in the third quarter, and Los Angeles added a field goal in the fourth to finish the game at 34–7.
The scoring included three Stafford touchdown passes and a defensive touchdown from Cobie Durant. Davante Adams caught two scoring passes, while Colby Parkinson caught the other. Tez Johnson scored Tampa Bay’s only touchdown on a pass from Baker Mayfield. These details explain an important difference: the Rams scored through both their offense and defense, while the Buccaneers struggled to finish drives.
Quarterback Stats and Passing Accuracy
Stafford completed 25 of 35 passes for 273 yards, three touchdowns, and no interceptions. His completion rate was 71.4%, and his passer rating was 122.7. In the Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs Los Angeles Rams Match Player Stats, his clean passing line stands out. He produced more yards than both Tampa Bay quarterbacks combined and avoided giving the ball away.
| Quarterback | Completions/Attempts | Passing Yards | Touchdowns | Interceptions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew Stafford | 25/35 | 273 | 3 | 0 |
| Baker Mayfield | 9/19 | 41 | 1 | 2 |
| Teddy Bridgewater | 8/15 | 62 | 0 | 0 |
Mayfield finished with a 32.0 passer rating, while Teddy Bridgewater recorded 63.8. Together, they completed 17 of 34 attempts for 103 yards. Bridgewater gained more passing yards, but neither quarterback built a steady attack. The combined 50% completion rate shows how often Tampa Bay’s passing plays ended without a catch, limiting its chances to move downfield.
Rushing Yards and Running Back Production
Tampa Bay led the rushing totals with 123 yards on 29 attempts, compared with 70 yards on 19 carries for Los Angeles. Sean Tucker had 12 carries for 42 yards. Rachaad White added 38 yards on seven attempts, averaging 5.4 yards per carry. Mayfield contributed 19 yards, Johnson gained 12, and Owen Wright and Bridgewater added six each.
Kyren Williams led all runners with 46 yards on 12 carries. Blake Corum supplied another 24 yards on seven attempts. Neither team scored a rushing touchdown. The Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs Los Angeles Rams Match Player Stats therefore show that a rushing advantage alone did not decide this game. Tampa Bay moved the ball on the ground, but its passing problems and missed scoring chances carried more weight.
Rams Receiving Stats and Touchdown Targets
Puka Nacua led the Rams with seven catches for 97 yards from 11 targets. His longest reception gained 31 yards. Adams caught five passes for 62 yards from eight targets, including touchdowns of one and 24 yards. These players offered different kinds of value. Nacua led in receiving yards, while Adams turned two of his catches into scores.
Parkinson caught all four of his targets for 41 yards and a touchdown. Davis Allen added three catches for 29 yards, Konata Mumpfield had two for 25, and Jordan Whittington caught three for 17. Williams added one catch for two yards, while Terrance Ferguson had no catches from one target. The Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs Los Angeles Rams Match Player Stats show how Stafford spread the ball across several options.
Buccaneers Receiving Stats and Catch Totals
Emeka Egbuka led Tampa Bay with 32 receiving yards from three catches on eight targets. Cade Otton led the team in receptions, catching four passes for 21 yards from seven targets. Johnson also gained 21 receiving yards on three catches, including the team’s only touchdown. His scoring reception covered 14 yards during the second quarter.
Sterling Shepard finished with three catches for 12 yards, while Chris Godwin caught two passes for nine. Tucker and White each added one catch for four yards. When reading the Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs Los Angeles Rams Match Player Stats, compare catches with targets as well as yards. Egbuka received the most targets, but several of those opportunities did not become completed passes.
Interceptions and Defensive Scoring
Durant made one of the game’s biggest plays when he intercepted Mayfield and returned the ball 50 yards for a first-quarter touchdown. That score helped Los Angeles build a 14–0 lead. Emmanuel Forbes added another interception and returned it 31 yards. Together, the two defenders produced 81 interception return yards, giving the Rams valuable field position and seven direct points.
Tampa Bay did not intercept Stafford. This difference is central to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs Los Angeles Rams Match Player Stats because turnovers affect both teams at once. An interception ends one offense’s possession and gives the other team the ball. Durant’s return went further by adding a touchdown without requiring another offensive drive from the Rams.
Sacks, Tackles and Pressure on the Quarterbacks
Kobie Turner and Jared Verse each recorded two sacks for Los Angeles. Turner also finished with six combined tackles, while Verse had four. Their sacks cost Tampa Bay 33 yards in total. Mayfield was sacked twice for 12 yards, and Bridgewater was sacked twice for 21. Those losses made an already difficult passing night even harder.
Kamren Curl led the Rams with eight combined tackles. Kamren Kinchens and Nate Landman added seven each. For Tampa Bay, Lavonte David and Antoine Winfield Jr. shared the lead with eight combined tackles apiece, followed by SirVocea Dennis with seven. Yaya Diaby recorded the Buccaneers’ only sack, taking Stafford down for a ten-yard loss. Combined tackles include solo stops and assisted tackles.
Kicking, Punting and Return Yards
Harrison Mevis made both of his field goal attempts, connecting from 40 and 52 yards. He also made all four extra points, contributing ten points altogether. Chase McLaughlin made Tampa Bay’s only extra-point attempt and did not attempt a field goal. The Rams therefore received useful scoring support from their kicker, while Tampa Bay’s kicking line reflected its limited touchdown production.
Riley Dixon punted four times for 169 yards, averaging 42.3 yards. Ethan Evans had three punts for 105 yards, averaging 35.0. On returns, Wright gained 48 yards from two kickoff returns for Tampa Bay. Kameron Johnson returned one punt for 15 yards, while Williams returned one punt for eight yards for Los Angeles. Neither side scored a touchdown on a kick or punt return.
Total Yards and Net Passing Yards Explained
Los Angeles finished with 333 total net yards, while Tampa Bay gained 193. The Rams averaged 6.1 yards per offensive play, compared with 2.9 for the Buccaneers. These Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs Los Angeles Rams Match Player Stats help explain how Los Angeles scored more despite running fewer plays. Its offense gained more ground each time it operated.
| Team Statistic | Buccaneers | Rams |
|---|---|---|
| Total Net Yards | 193 | 333 |
| Rushing Yards | 123 | 70 |
| Net Passing Yards | 70 | 263 |
| First Downs | 14 | 20 |
| Offensive Plays | 67 | 55 |
Passing totals need careful reading. Stafford threw for 273 yards, but the Rams had 263 net passing yards after his ten-yard sack loss. Tampa Bay’s quarterbacks threw for 103 yards, but four sacks removed 33 yards, leaving 70 net passing yards. Player passing yards and team net passing yards measure different things. Using the correct label prevents a misleading comparison.
Third Downs, Fourth Downs and Red Zone Results
Tampa Bay converted seven of 17 third downs, a rate of 41.2%. Los Angeles converted four of ten, or 40%. Those rates were close, even though the final score was not. The Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs Los Angeles Rams Match Player Stats become clearer when third downs are viewed alongside fourth downs, scoring chances, and gains on earlier plays.
The Buccaneers converted only one of five fourth-down attempts. The Rams failed on their only fourth-down try. Inside the red zone, which is the area within the opponent’s 20-yard line, Tampa Bay scored one touchdown from three trips. Los Angeles scored touchdowns on both of its two visits. Tampa Bay created opportunities but often finished those possessions without the points it needed.
Turnovers, Penalties and Time of Possession
Tampa Bay held the ball for 31 minutes and 48 seconds. Los Angeles had possession for 28 minutes and 12 seconds. The Buccaneers also committed fewer penalties, drawing two flags for ten yards compared with four for 32 yards against the Rams. These Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs Los Angeles Rams Match Player Stats show why possession time and penalty totals should not be read alone.
The turnover difference was more costly. Tampa Bay threw two interceptions, while Los Angeles committed no turnovers. Graham Barton was charged with a fumble, but Mayfield recovered it, so it was not a lost possession. It is useful to separate a fumble from a lost fumble. Only the latter gives the opposing team control of the ball.
What the Box Score Shows About the Result
The clearest explanation combines passing success, defensive scoring, and finishing drives. Stafford threw three touchdown passes without an interception. Durant supplied a defensive touchdown, and Mevis added two field goals. In contrast, Tampa Bay produced only one touchdown and failed on four fourth-down attempts. The large scoring gap came from several parts of the game working together for Los Angeles.
For a useful reading of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs Los Angeles Rams Match Player Stats, start with yards per play, turnovers, and scoring chances. Then review individual players to see who created those results. Nacua’s receiving yards, Adams’ touchdowns, and the sacks from Turner and Verse explain different parts of the win. This approach gives a fuller picture than choosing a player based only on one large number.
Conclusion
The Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs Los Angeles Rams Match Player Stats explain a 34–7 Rams win built on accurate passing, defensive plays, and strong finishing. Stafford led the passing game, Nacua topped the receiving yards, and Adams caught two touchdowns. Tampa Bay had the stronger rushing total and more possession time, but those advantages did not bring enough points. Reading player numbers alongside sacks, turnovers, and red zone results gives the most useful view of this November 23, 2025 meeting.
(FAQ’s)
1. Who won the Buccaneers vs Rams game on November 23, 2025?
The Los Angeles Rams won 34–7 at SoFi Stadium.
2. How many passing yards did Matthew Stafford record?
Stafford threw for 273 yards, three touchdowns, and no interceptions.
3. Who led the game in receiving yards?
Puka Nacua led all receivers with 97 yards on seven catches.
4. Which team gained more rushing yards?
Tampa Bay gained 123 rushing yards, compared with 70 for Los Angeles.
5. Why were the Rams’ net passing yards lower than Stafford’s passing yards?
A ten-yard sack loss reduced their net passing total from 273 to 263 yards.
You may also read: Tennessee Titans vs Colts Match Player Stats With Passing, Rushing and Receiving Yards
Visit for more additional information: Zellow Magazine