A leading scorer can stand out, yet the full box score often explains much more about a basketball game. The Golden State Valkyries vs Indiana Fever Match Player Stats from July 15, 2026 show how scoring depth, shooting accuracy and free throws shaped an 88–75 Golden State win. Kelsey Mitchell led all players in points, but the Valkyries received useful scoring from across their lineup. This breakdown covers that completed WNBA game at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis, including every player who appeared, the main team numbers and the moments that decided the result.
Match Date, Final Score and Quarter Results
Golden State won the opening quarter 20–18 and added a 20–12 second quarter to reach halftime ahead 40–30. Indiana responded after the break, winning the third quarter 21–18. That reduced the gap to seven points, with Golden State leading 58–51 before the final period. The Valkyries then scored 30 fourth-quarter points against Indiana’s 24 to finish with a 13-point victory.
The Golden State Valkyries vs Indiana Fever Match Player Stats in this article refer only to July 15, 2026. Keeping the date clear matters because these teams can meet several times during a season. A player’s numbers from another meeting should never be added to this box score. Here, the quarter results also show why the final margin needs context: Indiana stayed within reach before Golden State pulled away again.
Golden State Valkyries Full Player Box Score
The Golden State Valkyries vs Indiana Fever Match Player Stats show six Valkyries reaching double figures. Below, MIN means minutes played, REB means rebounds, AST means assists, STL means steals, BLK means blocks, TO means turnovers and PF means personal fouls. FG, 3PT and FT show makes and attempts for field goals, three-pointers and free throws. The first five players were starters.
| Player | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT | FT | STL | BLK | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kayla Thornton | 31:02 | 11 | 8 | 1 | 3/8 | 2/5 | 3/3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Cecilia Zandalasini | 18:05 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 4/8 | 2/5 | 0/0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kiah Stokes | 22:48 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 2/7 | 0/4 | 0/0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Gabby Williams | 26:34 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 6/12 | 2/5 | 2/4 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 1 |
| Veronica Burton | 30:22 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 1/4 | 0/1 | 2/2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
| Kaila Charles | 13:26 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1/2 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Janelle Salaün | 21:55 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 4/7 | 2/4 | 2/2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Tiffany Hayes | 21:55 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 3/4 | 0/0 | 7/7 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Laeticia Amihere | 04:15 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Kaitlyn Chen | 09:38 | 14 | 0 | 3 | 5/5 | 0/0 | 4/5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Nadia Fingall and Juste Jocyte did not play because of coaching decisions. The active lineup offered several kinds of value. Williams led the scoring, Thornton led the rebounding and Burton led the assists. Stokes added rim protection, while the reserves supplied points without needing the starters to carry every possession.
Indiana Fever Full Player Box Score
For Indiana, the Golden State Valkyries vs Indiana Fever Match Player Stats begin with Mitchell’s game-high 20 points. Boston and Clark followed with 15 and 13. The table uses the same labels as Golden State’s, making direct comparisons easier. Indiana’s first five listed players started the game, while the remaining five appeared from the bench.
| Player | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT | FT | STL | BLK | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lexie Hull | 22:08 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1/4 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Monique Billings | 25:34 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 1/5 | 0/0 | 2/4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Aliyah Boston | 25:17 | 15 | 7 | 1 | 6/11 | 2/3 | 1/2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Kelsey Mitchell | 35:18 | 20 | 1 | 4 | 7/16 | 3/5 | 3/3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Caitlin Clark | 25:32 | 13 | 3 | 6 | 4/14 | 1/8 | 4/5 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 |
| Sophie Cunningham | 27:02 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 3/7 | 2/4 | 2/2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Makayla Timpson | 19:09 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 3/4 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tyasha Harris | 18:31 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2/5 | 1/4 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Raven Johnson | 00:53 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grace VanSlooten | 00:37 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Damiris Dantas and Myisha Hines-Allen did not play because of coaching decisions. Cunningham gave Indiana its fourth double-figure scorer, while Timpson made three of her four shots. Johnson and VanSlooten each played less than one minute, so their small totals should be viewed alongside their limited time on the court.
Gabby Williams Led a Balanced Scoring Attack
Williams finished with 16 points on 6-for-12 shooting, including two three-pointers. Her three steals and one block added value at the other end. In the Golden State Valkyries vs Indiana Fever Match Player Stats, her performance stands out because she helped in several areas while leading her team in scoring. She also had five turnovers, which belongs in a fair review of her night.
Her scoring total was enough to lead Golden State because other players shared the work. This is an important part of reading a balanced offense. A team does not always need one player to score heavily if several teammates finish their chances. Williams supplied the highest individual total, while the wider lineup helped turn that production into a winning team score.
Kelsey Mitchell and Aliyah Boston Kept Indiana Competitive
Mitchell scored 20 points, made three of five three-point attempts and converted all three free throws. She also had four assists against two turnovers. Boston added 15 points, seven rebounds and two steals. Their combined 35 points gave Indiana a clear scoring base, with Mitchell providing outside shooting and Boston contributing both baskets and rebounds.
The Golden State Valkyries vs Indiana Fever Match Player Stats also show Boston making two of three shots from beyond the arc. That detail helps explain her scoring mix beyond her work near the basket. Still, strong individual lines do not settle a team result. To judge Indiana’s offense fairly, readers must also examine the other scorers, the total shooting rate and the number of successful possessions.
Caitlin Clark’s Passing Added Value on a Difficult Shooting Night
Clark recorded 13 points, six assists, three rebounds, one steal and one block. She made four of 14 field-goal attempts and one of eight three-pointers. Those numbers show a difficult shooting game, especially from long range. Her four made free throws from five attempts helped her scoring total when her outside shots were not falling.
When reading the Golden State Valkyries vs Indiana Fever Match Player Stats, Clark’s passing deserves attention alongside her missed shots. Her six assists led all players, although she also committed four turnovers. An assist credits a pass leading directly to a made basket. It does not measure every useful pass, just as a missed shot alone cannot explain whether an attempt came from a good scoring chance.
Bench Scoring Gave Golden State a Major Advantage
Adding the reserve rows produces 43 bench points for Golden State against 21 for Indiana. Chen, Hayes and Salaün supplied 39 of those Valkyries points. Chen was especially efficient, scoring 14 points while making all five field-goal attempts. Hayes added 13, including seven successful free throws, and Salaün scored 12 with two made three-pointers.
This calculation from the Golden State Valkyries vs Indiana Fever Match Player Stats reveals an important difference between the teams. Indiana’s starters scored 54 points, compared with Golden State’s 45, but the reserves changed the overall balance. Bench scoring can rise when a usual starter plays a reserve role, so it should not become a fixed judgment about team quality. In this game, however, the contribution was substantial.
Shooting Accuracy and Free Throws Explained the Gap
Golden State made 30 of 58 shots for 51.7 percent, while Indiana made 27 of 67 for 40.3 percent. The Fever attempted nine more field goals but scored fewer baskets. Indiana did make one more three-pointer, finishing nine of 25 against Golden State’s eight of 24. The larger difference came from overall accuracy and production inside the three-point line.
Free throws added another clear advantage in the Golden State Valkyries vs Indiana Fever Match Player Stats. The Valkyries made 20 of 23, compared with Indiana’s 12 of 16. Breaking down the final score shows Golden State gaining eight more points from two-point baskets and eight more from free throws, while Indiana gained three more from three-pointers. Together, those differences explain the 13-point margin.
Rebounds and Second Chances Told Different Stories
The player rebound totals were 30 for Golden State and 26 for Indiana. Thornton led the Valkyries with eight, while Boston led the Fever with seven. However, Indiana collected 10 offensive rebounds against Golden State’s six. The Fever also led second-chance scoring 14–4, showing that their work after missed shots created useful extra offense.
This is why total rebounds should be read alongside offensive and defensive rebounds. Winning one category does not mean winning every part of the rebounding contest. The official report also lists team rebounds separately from rebounds credited to players. When comparing different box score displays, check whether team rebounds are included before treating different totals as an error.
Assists, Steals and Turnovers Need Careful Reading
Golden State finished with 16 assists, nine steals and four blocks. Indiana had 14 assists, eight steals and two blocks. These totals support a wider view of the game, but they need context. A steal records a possession won directly from the opponent. A block records a rejected shot, although it does not guarantee that the defending team recovered the ball afterward.
The player rows add up to 14 Golden State turnovers and 15 Indiana turnovers. The official totals, including team turnovers, were 17 and 16. Golden State nevertheless scored 22 points from turnovers, compared with Indiana’s 16. The useful lesson is to examine what happened after mistakes, alongside how many mistakes occurred. A turnover count alone cannot show the full cost of lost possessions.
The Fourth Quarter Created the Final Separation
Golden State entered the fourth quarter ahead 58–51 and pushed the score to 69–56 after an 11–5 start to the period. Salaün’s outside shooting and Chen’s scoring helped build that cushion. Later, a Hayes basket and free throw made it 80–65 with 3:30 remaining. These scoring sequences gave the Valkyries room to handle Indiana’s next response.
Mitchell helped Indiana cut the deficit to 80–73 with 1:40 left, but the Fever could not finish the comeback. Golden State’s successful free throws then helped secure the result. This sequence is a reminder that a final score can hide changes in pressure. Reading the score by quarter and checking late possessions explains when a team built control and whether its opponent still had a chance.
How to Read the Player Numbers Fairly
Start with minutes, then connect scoring to attempts and shooting accuracy. A player who scores more may also have taken many more shots. Next, check rebounds, assists, defensive contributions and turnovers. Comparing players with similar minutes also helps put their output in context. The Golden State Valkyries vs Indiana Fever Match Player Stats become more useful when those columns are read together. For example, a low scoring total can sit beside valuable passing or defensive work.
Use plus-minus with care if you consult an expanded box score. It measures the team’s score difference during a player’s time on the floor, so teammates and opposing lineups affect it. It does not prove that one player caused every good or bad result. For a clearer review, combine the box score with the game’s scoring sequence and video of the possessions you want to understand.
Conclusion
The Golden State Valkyries vs Indiana Fever Match Player Stats from July 15, 2026 explain an 88–75 win built on shared scoring, stronger overall shooting and a large bench contribution. Mitchell led all scorers, Boston added useful scoring and rebounding, and Clark led the assists. Golden State received enough production across its lineup to overcome Indiana’s advantage in second-chance points. Reading the full box score makes those differences clear and gives each player’s performance proper context.
(FAQ’s)
1. Who won the July 15, 2026 game?
Golden State beat Indiana 88–75 at Gainbridge Fieldhouse.
2. Who scored the most points?
Kelsey Mitchell led all players with 20 points.
3. Who led Golden State in scoring?
Gabby Williams finished with 16 points.
4. What were Caitlin Clark’s main stats?
Clark recorded 13 points, three rebounds and six assists.
5. How many points did Golden State’s bench score?
Its reserves combined for 43 points.
You may also read: Golden State Warriors vs Denver Nuggets Match Player Stats and Full Box Score Breakdown
Visit for more additional information: Zellow Magazine